• Website
  • Iklan
  • Polisi dan Privasi
  • Hubungi Kami
Pakguard.online
  • MUKA UTAMA
  • BERITA DAN ARTIKEL
  • CERPEN
  • SURAT PEMBACA
  • SIAPA KAMI
  • ENGLISH SECTION
No Result
View All Result
  • MUKA UTAMA
  • BERITA DAN ARTIKEL
  • CERPEN
  • SURAT PEMBACA
  • SIAPA KAMI
  • ENGLISH SECTION
No Result
View All Result
Pakguard.online
No Result
View All Result

America’s Nuclear Fist: Glory Trip 255 and the Missile That Refuses to Die

by Pakgad Man
06/05/2026
Home ENGLISH SECTION
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By PakGuard.Online Editorial


An unarmed Minuteman III ICBM blazed across the Pacific on a Tuesday night, and the world held its breath — not because it was new, but because it is old, it is still lethal, and the timing could not have been more pointed.


Mission Brief — GT-255 Fast Facts

DetailData
Launch Date & Time3 March 2026, 23:01 PST
Launch SiteVandenberg Space Force Base, California
DesignationGlory Trip 255 (GT-255)
Payload2 Unarmed Test Reentry Vehicles
Target AreaKwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands (~6,750 km)
Source MissilePulled from 91st Missile Wing, Minot AFB, North Dakota
Top SpeedUp to 15,000 mph / Mach 20
Programme Total300+ launches since programme began

A Missile Test in the Middle of a War

Just after 11 o’clock on the night of 3 March 2026, the skies above California’s central coast lit up with something that most people last saw — if they saw it at all — during the Cold War. An LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, unarmed but fully functional, erupted from its silo at Vandenberg Space Force Base and began its long arc across the Pacific Ocean. Twenty minutes later, two inert reentry vehicles splashed down near Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands, roughly 6,750 kilometres from their point of origin. The test was designated Glory Trip 255, or GT-255 — and it sent shockwaves through every defence ministry on the planet, even as the U.S. Air Force insisted it was the most routine thing in the world.

It wasn’t routine. Not this time. Not in this world.

Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) conducted the operational test launch on March 3, 2026, to demonstrate the readiness of U.S. nuclear forces and provide confidence in the lethality and effectiveness of the nation’s nuclear deterrent.1 The official line was clear: this was business as usual. “This launch, designated GT 255, was scheduled years ago, and is not in response to world events,” the Air Force said in a statement.2

Yet the context was impossible to ignore. The launch coincided with ongoing U.S. military activity in Iran, known as Operation Epic Fury.3 The test also came at a moment of intense nuclear signalling across the globe — with France repositioning assets in the Mediterranean and Moscow watching Washington’s every move with heightened suspicion.

“The operational message is not that an ICBM test equals imminent use, but that the United States is actively proving the most demanding portions of its strategic strike chain under real-world conditions.”

— Army Recognition, March 2026 4

In that environment, a U.S. ICBM flight test that explicitly validates multi-vehicle deployment functions less as a tactical cue than as strategic reassurance and deterrence maintenance, signalling that the United States retains credible, tested options even as attention and munitions inventories are pulled toward urgent conventional operations.4


What Exactly Did GT-255 Test?

The test is one of more than 300 conducted under a decades-long evaluation programme aimed at confirming the weapon system’s reliability and performance. The missile’s two reentry vehicles, designed to increase the missile’s effectiveness against defended targets, travelled thousands of miles before reaching a predetermined target at Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.5

The choice to fly two reentry vehicles was significant. Having multiple reentry vehicles makes the missile more effective against defences, as it allows one missile to carry several warheads or to saturate enemy defences with decoys.6

The Missile Itself: A Cold War Thoroughbred

The Minuteman III ICBM stands 59 feet 10 inches tall, weighs 78,000 pounds, and has a maximum diameter of six feet. Built by Boeing, it can travel over 6,000 miles at speeds up to 15,000 mph and reach altitudes up to 700 miles above Earth’s surface. It is capable of carrying one to three MK-12 or MK-12A warheads.3

When armed, each Minuteman III carries a single nuclear warhead with an estimated atomic yield equivalent to more than 300 kilotons of TNT — more than 20 times the estimated yield of the 15-kiloton bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, during World War II.2 That is not a weapon. That is the end of a city.

Engineers and weapons experts from the 377th Test and Evaluation Group collected data on the missile’s accuracy and system performance. Data gathered during GT-255 was distributed among stakeholders including the Department of Energy and U.S. Strategic Command for ongoing force development evaluation.3


What the Commanders Said

“It is critical to test all aspects of our ICBM force, including our ability to deliver multiple, independently targeted payloads with absolute precision.”

— Gen. S.L. Davis, Commander, Air Force Global Strike Command 5

Lt. Col. Karrie Wray, commander of the 576th Flight Test Squadron, stated: “GT 255 allowed us to assess the performance of individual components of the missile system. By continually assessing varying mission profiles, we are able to enhance the performance of the entire ICBM fleet, ensuring the maximum level of readiness for the land-based leg of the nation’s nuclear triad.”5

Col. Dustin Harmon, commander of the 377th Test and Evaluation Group, added: “Test launches are the most visible and vital way we verify our capabilities and validate the performance of our systems. The men and women of our missile community represent some of the most highly trained professionals in our nation’s defence.”7


Moscow’s Response: Calm, But Watching

The world did not panic — but it did pay close attention. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov stated in comments to RIA Novosti that Washington had notified Moscow about the ICBM test. Ryabkov emphasised that notification procedures and communication channels within the framework of strategic stability remain operational, indicating that the launch had been reported under routine agreements.8

That confirmation — that the hotline still works, that Moscow was told in advance — was itself a message: even in an era of rising tensions, the architecture of nuclear communication between the two great powers has not yet broken down.

The test also arrived just after the expiration of New START. The expiration of the New START treaty in February 2026 removed the last binding, verified limits on U.S. and Russian deployed strategic forces, making the specific configuration of any ICBM test — including the decision to fly multiple reentry vehicles — more salient than it would have been in previous years.4


An Ageing Giant on the Edge of Retirement

GT-255 was not just a test of a missile. It was a test of whether an ageing system — one that has been on alert since 1970 — can still be trusted with the nation’s survival.

Timeline: The Minuteman III Through the Years

YearEvent
1970Minuteman III enters service as the land-based leg of the U.S. nuclear triad
2015U.S. Air Force completes a $7 billion life-extension programme
Nov 2023A Minuteman III test fails — missile destroyed over the Pacific after a post-launch anomaly
2025Multiple tests (February, May, June, November) as testing cadence increases
3 Mar 2026GT-255 — two reentry vehicles successfully deployed over 6,750 km to Kwajalein Atoll
2027 (Planned)First pad launch of the LGM-35A Sentinel; first flight test now targeted for March 2028 9
Early 2030sSentinel Initial Operational Capability (IOC) — delayed from original 2029 target
2050 (Possible)Potential Minuteman III extended service life if Sentinel delays continue

Due to delays in the Sentinel programme, the Air Force is evaluating options to keep the Minuteman III operational through 2050, more than a decade beyond its originally planned service life.5

The GT-255 test and the multiple tests of 2025 confirm that the Air Force is ramping up its testing cadence to compensate for ageing components and Sentinel delays. With the GAO’s February 2026 report (GAO-26-108755) flagging that the Air Force needs a formal transition risk management plan, the Minuteman III’s path to 2050 operation is becoming less theoretical and more operationally real with every passing quarter.1011

The Sentinel Question

The U.S. plans to phase out the Minuteman III with the deployment of the new LGM-35A Sentinel ballistic missile system, originally planned to begin in 2029. However, Sentinel’s Initial Operational Capability has slipped to the early 2030s due to programme delays and an 81% cost overrun that pushed the total estimated programme cost to approximately $140.9 billion — rounded to $141 billion in most official communications.1213

The Air Force says Sentinel’s programme restructure is targeted for completion by end of 2026, with a Milestone B decision planned, a first pad launch in 2027, and the first flight test now slated for March 2028 per the GAO.1214


What This Means for the Rest of the World

For security professionals and defence analysts outside the United States, the GT-255 launch carries several important implications.

Nuclear deterrence is alive and active. The test was the 255th in a programme that has run for decades. It is not theatre — it is maintenance. The 45 Missile Alert Facilities and two-officer launch crews working around the clock are a reminder that this is not a museum artefact — it is a live, alert, and constantly validated nuclear deterrent.10

The post-New START world is more dangerous. With the last arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow now expired, there are no longer binding limits on how many warheads either side deploys. The multi-reentry vehicle test signals that Washington retains the technical option to increase its warhead load if strategic conditions demand it.4

Timing matters in nuclear signalling. The test comes as media outlets have reported Iran’s first operational use of its Fattah-2 hypersonic missile during current combat activities.3 Whether deliberate or not, the optics of an ICBM launch during an active conventional conflict is not lost on anyone who studies deterrence theory.

“The data we gather ensures our long-range strike capabilities are not just a theoretical concept, but a proven, reliable, and lethal force, ready to defend the nation at a moment’s notice.”

— Gen. S.L. Davis, AFGSC Commander 3

Command and control is being rehearsed. For operators, an ICBM test is also a command-and-control rehearsal at scale. Minuteman III missiles are distributed across hardened silos and tied to underground launch control centres; two-officer crews sit alert around the clock with multiple communications paths designed to transmit presidential direction with minimal latency.10 Every test validates not just the rocket, but the entire human and electronic chain that would be needed to launch one in anger.


The Old Fist Still Punches

The Minuteman III first stood guard over the American homeland in 1970, when Neil Armstrong had only just returned from the Moon and Richard Nixon was in the White House. Fifty-six years later, it is still on alert — still tested, still lethal, still watching.

GT-255 was, in the truest sense, routine. The U.S. Air Force has done this more than 300 times. But routine is precisely the point. In the doctrine of nuclear deterrence, predictable reliability is the deterrent. An adversary who knows that the missile will work, that the crew is trained, that the warhead will arrive — is an adversary who thinks twice.

The world is changing fast. New START is gone. Iran has fired hypersonic missiles in anger. Sentinel is delayed and over budget. And yet, every 11 o’clock on some dark California night, when the countdown reaches zero, the old Minuteman III still rises from its hole in the ground and reminds everyone — friend and foe alike — that America’s nuclear guarantee is not a bluff.

For those of us who study security for a living, that is worth understanding. Whether you are a guard at a gatehouse in Selangor or a strategist in the Pentagon, the fundamental principle is the same: a demonstrated capability is a credible one. You show it, you test it, you maintain it — or you lose it.

The Minuteman III showed up. As it always has.


Tags: Minuteman III · GT-255 · Nuclear Deterrence · ICBM · U.S. Air Force · LGM-35A Sentinel · Global Security · Strategic Analysis · Operation Epic Fury · Vandenberg


Sources & Footnotes


Fact-Check Notes (Editor’s Reference)

The following corrections were made from the original draft after source verification:

  1. Sentinel IOC date clarified: Original text said phase-out “beginning in 2029.” Corrected to reflect that IOC has slipped to the early 2030s due to delays, per Air Force statements (February 2026) and CRS/Congress.gov.
  2. Sentinel cost: “$141 billion” is an acceptable round figure; the precise DoD CAPE estimate is $140.9 billion (July 2024 Nunn-McCurdy review). Both figures appear in official sources; article uses “$140.9 billion” with footnote clarification.
  3. Pad launch vs. flight test distinction: The article originally implied the first test flight was 2027. Corrected: pad launch (ground test) is planned for 2027; first flight test is now GAO-projected for March 2028. Timeline table updated accordingly.
  4. Data stakeholders: Confirmed as DoE and US Strategic Command per Airforce Technology (fetched directly). Stars & Stripes does not separately list DoD in this context; reference updated to reflect verified sources only.
  5. All quotes (Gen. Davis, Lt. Col. Wray, Col. Harmon), all missile technical specifications, all diplomatic facts (Ryabkov, Operation Epic Fury, Fattah-2, New START expiry) — confirmed against primary sources.

© 2026 PakGuard.Online — Malaysia’s Private Security Industry Platform. All rights reserved.

Footnotes

  1. Vandenberg Space Force Base, Official Press Release — GT 255 Minuteman III ICBM Test Launch, March 4, 2026. Published by Senior Airman Kevin Hernandez. https://www.vandenberg.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4420581/gt-255-minuteman-iii-icbm-test-launch/ [VERIFIED — fetched directly] ↩
  2. Stars and Stripes — Air Force test launches Minuteman III ICBM, by Gary Warner, March 5, 2026. https://www.stripes.com/branches/air_force/2026-03-05/air-force-test-icbm-minuteman-iii-20964411.html [VERIFIED — fetched directly; warhead yield figure, $141B Sentinel, 400 ICBMs, $7B life extension all confirmed here] ↩ ↩2
  3. Airforce Technology — US AFGSC tests unarmed Minuteman III ICBM from Vandenberg, by Jangoulun Singsit, March 5, 2026. https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/us-afgsc-minuteman-icbm-test/ [VERIFIED — fetched directly; missile specs, Operation Epic Fury, Fattah-2, Gen. Davis quote confirmed; data goes to DoE and US Strategic Command] ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5
  4. Army Recognition — U.S. Launches Minuteman III ICBM With 2 Reentry Vehicles in GT-255 Nuclear Deterrence Test, March 5, 2026. https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2026/u-s-launches-minuteman-iii-icbm-with-2-reentry-vehicles-in-gt-255-nuclear-deterrence-test [VERIFIED via search result; New START expiry, strategic analysis confirmed] ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
  5. Air Force Times — Air Force test launches Minuteman III with multiple reentry vehicles, March 6, 2026. https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2026/03/06/air-force-test-launches-minuteman-iii-with-multiple-reentry-vehicles/ [VERIFIED via search result] ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
  6. Overt Defense — US Air Force Tests Minuteman III ICBM with Multiple Reentry Vehicles, March 10, 2026. https://www.overtdefense.com/2026/03/10/us-air-force-tests-minuteman-iii-icbm-with-multiple-reentry-vehicles/ [VERIFIED via search result] ↩
  7. Global Defense Corp — U.S. Air Force conducts Minuteman III nuclear missile test launch, March 7, 2026. https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2026/03/07/u-s-air-force-conducts-minuteman-iii-nuclear-missile-test-launch/ [VERIFIED via search result; Col. Harmon quote confirmed] ↩
  8. C4Defence — First Statement from Russia on the U.S. Minuteman III Test Launch, March 6, 2026. https://www.c4defence.com/en/us-minuteman-iii-test-moscow-response/ [VERIFIED — fetched directly; Ryabkov/RIA Novosti statement confirmed] ↩
  9. GAO Report, February 2026: First Sentinel flight test now targeted for March 2028, per Stars & Stripes reporting. First pad launch remains planned for 2027. These are two distinct milestones. https://www.stripes.com/branches/air_force/2026-02-19/sentinel-icbm-test-flight-2028-gao-20807489.html ↩
  10. The World Data — Minuteman III Statistics 2026 | Facts & GAO Data, March 2026. https://theworlddata.com/minuteman-3-statistics-and-facts/ [VERIFIED via search result; 45 Missile Alert Facilities, testing cadence increase confirmed] ↩ ↩2 ↩3
  11. GAO Report GAO-26-108755, February 2026 — cited across multiple sources including The World Data and Congress.gov CRS analysis. ↩
  12. Congress.gov / Congressional Research Service — Defense Primer: LGM-35A Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, March 4, 2026. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11681 [VERIFIED — confirmed $141B CAPE estimate, early 2030s IOC, Milestone B end-2026 target, pad launch 2027, flight test March 2028] ↩ ↩2
  13. Wikipedia — LGM-35 Sentinel (last updated May 2026). Cost confirmed at $140.9 billion following July 2024 Nunn-McCurdy review. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-35_Sentinel [VERIFIED] ↩
  14. Stars and Stripes — New ICBM program on track to potentially green light a prototype by the end of the year, February 17, 2026. https://www.stripes.com/branches/air_force/2026-02-17/new-icbm-prototype-end-of-year-20779065.html [VERIFIED — pad launch 2027, IOC early 2030s, Milestone B end-2026 confirmed] ↩
Previous Post

Rondaan Malam: Bila “Ancaman Tidak Dikenal Pasti” Rupanya Hanya Seekor Anjing

Next Post

Nasi Putih, Kuah, dan Seorang Lelaki Tua

Recommended.

DSA & NATSEC Asia 2026: Perkembangan dan Liputan Terkini

DSA & NATSEC Asia 2026: Perkembangan dan Liputan Terkini

22/04/2026
Bangkit Dari Pos Kawalan: Bahagian 3/5

Bangkit Dari Pos Kawalan: Bahagian 3/5

20/04/2026

Subscribe.

Trending.

Dari Pengawal ke Pakar: Adakah Pengkhususan Sistem Keselamatan Fizikal Berbaloi?

Dari Pengawal ke Pakar: Adakah Pengkhususan Sistem Keselamatan Fizikal Berbaloi?

20/05/2026
Sijil Antarabangsa: Pelaburan Jangka Panjang untuk Kerjaya Tanpa Sempadan

Sijil Antarabangsa: Pelaburan Jangka Panjang untuk Kerjaya Tanpa Sempadan

20/05/2026
Sijil Keselamatan Fizikal: Apa Yang Boleh Anda Dapat Tanpa Ke Luar Negara

Sijil Keselamatan Fizikal: Apa Yang Boleh Anda Dapat Tanpa Ke Luar Negara

20/05/2026
Bina Semula Sistem Bimbingan: Cara Hidupkan Semula Budaya Mentor Dalam Pasukan Anda

Bina Semula Sistem Bimbingan: Cara Hidupkan Semula Budaya Mentor Dalam Pasukan Anda

14/05/2026
The Crisis You’re Not Taking Seriously Enough — And What Helped Create That Problem

The Crisis You’re Not Taking Seriously Enough — And What Helped Create That Problem

14/05/2026
  • Website
  • Iklan
  • Polisi dan Privasi
  • Hubungi Kami
Ada komen atau ingin hantar luahan perasaan anda? Email kami@pakguard.online

© 2026 Copyright Pakguard.Online

No Result
View All Result
  • UTAMA
  • BERITA DAN ARTIKEL
  • CERPEN
  • SURAT PEMBACA
  • SIAPA KAMI
  • ENGLISH SECTION

© 2026 Copyright Pakguard.Online